For each character, the situation with which they are faced with deems that either their human character or animalistic character emerge. Victor Frankenstein The human aspects of Victor are those which one can associate with his emotional side.
I said, "Is it good, friend? The monsters simply want to live as the rest of us live. But, in our prejudice of their kind, we banish them from our elite society.
Who gave society the right to judge who is acceptable and who is not? A better question might be, who is going to stop them? The answer, no one. Therefore, society continues to alienate the undesirables of our community. Some of the greatest minds of all time have been socially unacceptable.
Albert Einstein lived alone and rarely wore the same color socks. Van Gogh found comfort only in his art, and the woman who consistently denied his passion.
Edgar Allen Poe was "different" to say the least. Just like these great men, Grendel and Frankenstein do not conform to the societal model.
Also like these men, Grendel and Frankenstein are uniquely superior to the rest of mankind. Grendel, though he needs to kill to do so, functions very well in his own sphere.
Grendel survives in a hostile climate where he is hated and feared by all. He lives in a cave protected by firesnakes so as to physically, as well as spiritually, separate himself from the society that detests, yet admires, him. Grendel is "the brute existent by which [humankind] learns to define itself" Gardner Like Grendel, Frankenstein also learns to live in a society that despises his kind.
Even the ever-loving paternal figure now turns away from this outcast from society. Frankenstein journeys to the far reaches of the world to escape from the societal ills that cause society to hate him.
He ventures to the harshest, most desolate, most uninhabitable place known to man, the north pole. He lives in isolation, in the cold acceptance of the icy glaciers. Frankenstein follows, pushing his creation to the edge of the world, hoping he would fall off, never to be seen or heard from again.
Frankenstein never makes an attempt to become one with society, yet he is finally accepted by the captain to whom he justifies his existence.
Frankenstein as to better explain to himself the nature of his own being by understanding the life of his creator. He accepts Frankenstein as a reluctant, yet devoted, servant to his master.
Granted that Frankenstein does not "belong," he is accepted with admiration by the captain. The respect that Frankenstein has longed for is finally given to him as he announces his suicide in the name of his father, the late Dr. On the other hand, Grendel makes numerous attempts to assimilate into society, but he is repeatedly turned back.
After being attacked by those he so admires, he turns against them to wreak havoc on their civilization. The more that society alienates Grendel and Frankenstein, the more they come to realize the invalidity of "social heroism. Social heroism is not a single event, it is properly defined as a "revolution.
This "revolution is not the substitution of immoral for moral, or of illegitimate violence for legitimate violence; it is simply the pitting of power against power, [hero against hero,] where the issue is freedom for the winners and enslavement of the rest" Gardner This revolution is built on intimidation by the powerful of society to oppress the undesirables.
According to the Shaper, the kingdom, those in power, pretends to be protecting the values of all people. Supposedly, the revolution causes the kingdom to save the values of the community-regulate compromise- improve the quality of the commonwealth.
In other words, protect the power of the people in power and repress the rest Drive them to the darkest corners of the kingdom, starve them, arrest and execute a few, or put them out to war. By a single stroke, the most criminal acts may be converted to heroic and meritorious deeds" Gardner An Analysis of Grendel and Frankenstein I saw a creature, naked, bestial, Who, squatting upon the ground, Held his heart in his hands, And ate of it.
A Comparison of Grendel and Frankenstein's Characters in Literature PAGES 2.
WORDS 1, View Full Essay. More essays like this: frankenstein, grendel. Apr 21, · Frankenstein and Hamlet are two pieces of literature that many connections can be made.
First and foremost in both stories, the main character suffers the loss of a loved one. In Hamlet, Hamlet loses his father and finds out that he was murdered by his Uncle Claudius.
Compounding this image is the fact that Beowulf literally tears Grendel's arm off--sending Grendel running off in fear. Essentially, while each man possesses both humanistic and animalistic characteristics, each characteristic comes out for different reasons.
- GRENDEL & FRANKENSTEIN AN ANALYSIS OF THE TWO "MONSTERS" AND THEIR SUPERIORITY TO MANKIND GRENDEL & FRANKENSTEIN AN ANALYSIS OF THE TWO "MONSTERS" AND THEIR SUPERIORITY TO MANKIND In the desert I saw a creature, naked, bestial, Who, squatting upon the ground, Held his heart in his hands, . A Comparison of Grendel and Frankenstein's Characters in Literature PAGES 2. WORDS 1, View Full Essay. More essays like this: frankenstein, mary shelley, grendel. Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University. Exactly what I needed. Sep 19, · A Songbird Who Sings said. Well, I hate to be so boring, but I agree with Sarah's points above. Although, I don't think Grendel has quite the same level of issue with his mother that the monster had with Frankenstein. It's more on a different wavelength, or something.
Both Grendel and Frankenstein share very similar qualities. Both are neglected or abandoned by their parental figure, and are left to figure out everything about life alone. Additionally, the lack of interaction with others has caused both monsters to become frustrated about self identity, and both become ruthless murderers as a result.
Besides both being ferocious fighters, Grendel and Beowulf are very different. Grendel is described as a descendant of Cain, the first murderer in the Bible. This would make him evil in the eyes of an audience of his day. Wild motif. This motif shows the difference evil, which helped portray the theme throughout that novel, and explained the overall effect of this theme on the poem as a piece of literature.
There are many symbols that represent good in Beowulf. Beowulf himself is a symbol of good in this epic.